From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9925 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2009 17:54:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 9911 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Sep 2009 17:54:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:54:03 +0000 Received: from int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.17]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8EHs0jx023533; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:54:00 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8EHrx9p021201; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:54:00 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8EHrw34001179; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:53:59 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 68135378175; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:53:58 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] better dwarf checking for values on the stack References: <20090910231912.0733A843B9@localhost> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:54:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:23:38 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00424.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Tom> It seems to me that the inferior-stack-ness of a value must be an Tom> attribute carried alongside the value on the dwarf stack. Doug> How about this? Yeah, I think this is the way to go. Thanks. Tom