From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9205 invoked by alias); 3 May 2010 17:40:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 9197 invoked by uid 22791); 3 May 2010 17:40:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 May 2010 17:40:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o43He9ij028358 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 3 May 2010 13:40:09 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o43He8MR015628; Mon, 3 May 2010 13:40:08 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o43He6nB007838; Mon, 3 May 2010 13:40:07 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 712D8378183; Mon, 3 May 2010 11:40:06 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: "Pierre Muller" Cc: Subject: Re: [RFA] examine for TYPE_CODE_REF (PR 11349) References: <17731.9300863475$1272644394@news.gmane.org> <000c01caea4b$4ef18ba0$ecd4a2e0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 17:40:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <000c01caea4b$4ef18ba0$ecd4a2e0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> (Pierre Muller's message of "Mon, 3 May 2010 01:00:48 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pierre" == Pierre Muller writes: Pierre> +send_gdb "x /hd rps\n" Pierre> +gdb_expect { Pierre> + -re ".* -1.*$gdb_prompt $" { Pierre> + pass "examine value at rps" Pierre> + } Pierre> + -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" { fail "examine value at rps" } Pierre> + timeout { fail "(timeout) examine value at rps" } Pierre> + } Pierre> + These days we're trying to use gdb_test rather than send_gdb. The patch is ok with that change. Tom