Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: pmuldoon@redhat.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Add an evaluation function hook to Python breakpoints.
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3fwu0s463.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m38vztlr2r.fsf@redhat.com> (Phil Muldoon's message of "Mon, 13	Dec 2010 13:50:36 +0000")

>>>>> "Phil" == Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com> writes:

Phil> +	  PyObject *gdbpy_bp_eval = PyString_FromString ("evaluate");

This is leaked.  However...

Phil> +	  if (PyObject_HasAttr (py_bp, gdbpy_bp_eval))
Phil> +	    {
Phil> +	      PyObject *result = PyObject_CallMethodObjArgs (py_bp,
Phil> +							     gdbpy_bp_eval,
Phil> +							     NULL);

You can just use PyObject_HasAttrString and PyObject_CallMethod instead.

Phil> +gdb_py_test_silent_cmd  "python eval_bp1 = bp_eval(\"$bp_location2\")" "Set breakpoint" 0
Phil> +gdb_py_test_silent_cmd  "python also_eval_bp1 = bp_also_eval(\"$bp_location2\")" "Set breakpoint" 0

I think there should also be a test for the case where there is an
ordinary user breakpoint at the same location as the Python breakpoints.
In this case, the user breakpoint should stop, but all the Python
methods should be invoked first.

Tom


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-14 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-13 13:50 Phil Muldoon
2010-12-13 14:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-12-13 14:47   ` Phil Muldoon
2010-12-13 15:07     ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-12-13 17:21       ` Phil Muldoon
2010-12-13 17:46         ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-12-13 14:33 ` Pedro Alves
2010-12-13 14:56   ` Phil Muldoon
2010-12-13 15:07     ` Pedro Alves
2010-12-13 20:45 ` Doug Evans
2010-12-13 21:02   ` Phil Muldoon
2010-12-14  3:31     ` Doug Evans
2010-12-14 17:18       ` Phil Muldoon
2010-12-14 17:28   ` Tom Tromey
2010-12-14 19:51     ` Phil Muldoon
2010-12-14 20:00       ` Phil Muldoon
2010-12-15 15:34     ` Phil Muldoon
2010-12-15 20:51       ` Tom Tromey
2011-01-27 12:44         ` Phil Muldoon
     [not found]           ` <AANLkTimi6ugruNAqUGHni8Kvkz+B5-s2aAkEoTY2D_gT@mail.gmail.com>
2011-01-27 21:40             ` Phil Muldoon
2011-01-28 10:42           ` Tom Tromey
2010-12-15 16:21     ` Doug Evans
2010-12-15 20:57       ` Tom Tromey
2010-12-21 17:33         ` Doug Evans
2010-12-21 20:02           ` Tom Tromey
2010-12-22 16:34             ` Doug Evans
2010-12-22 17:35               ` Tom Tromey
2010-12-28  5:53                 ` Doug Evans
2011-01-05 18:35                   ` Tom Tromey
2011-01-05 20:23                     ` Phil Muldoon
2011-01-09 20:32                       ` Doug Evans
2010-12-14 17:46   ` Pedro Alves
2010-12-14 16:35 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2010-12-14 17:02   ` Phil Muldoon
2010-12-14 17:48     ` Tom Tromey
2010-12-14 16:42 ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3fwu0s463.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
    --to=tromey@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pmuldoon@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox