From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-79767-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3328 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2011 20:13:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 3319 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2011 20:13:17 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:13:13 +0000
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2GKDAsQ022612	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:13:11 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2GKD93N008148;	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:13:10 -0400
From: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [python] [patch] Add is_valid to several classes
References: <m3sjun9hp7.fsf@redhat.com> <83r5a6q39z.fsf@gnu.org>	<m3tyf2vnp6.fsf@redhat.com> <83oc5aq17q.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-to: pmuldoon@redhat.com
X-URL: http://www.redhat.com
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 21:50:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <83oc5aq17q.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 16 Mar	2011 22:06:49 +0200")
Message-ID: <m3fwqmvn6y.fsf@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00880.txt.bz2

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
>> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:02:13 +0000
>> 
>> >> +@code{gdb.Block} supports via the Python method @code{iter} function.
>> >
>> > Did you really mean to say "Python method `iter' function"?  I think
>> > either "method" or "function", no?
>> 
>> iter() is a built in Python function (nothing to do with GDB), that
>> extracts an iterator from a Python object if the object supports it.  I
>> don't mind how we word it. It was purely illustrative.  In fact in
>> Python there are many ways to invoke iteration in an object that
>> supports it.  The "in" keyword for example (IE, for x in y).
>> What do you think?
>
> How about
>
>   @code{gdb.Block} supports via the Python method @code{iter}.
>
> ?  Is that accurate?

Paul's wording seems like a super-set of the above.  That seems to work
for me, does it for you?

Cheers

Phil