From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15781 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2011 19:06:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 15772 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Aug 2011 19:06:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:06:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7FJ6G0q016601 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:06:16 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7FJ6FlM024665; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:06:16 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7FJ6Etw015615; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:06:14 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Hui Zhu Cc: gdb-patches ml Subject: Re: [PATCH] printcmd.c (ui_printf): make internalvar string can be printf and eval when inferior cannot alloc memory References: Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:06:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Hui Zhu's message of "Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:09:17 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00308.txt.bz2 >>>>> ">" == Hui Zhu writes: >> Thanks for your help. >> I make a new patch according to your mail. >> 2011-08-14 Hui Zhu >> * printcmd.c (ui_printf): Add a handler for internalvar and >> TYPE_CODE_ARRAY. I still don't think this is correct. This special-cases lval_internalvar, but IIUC this will still fail for something like: printf "hi %s\n", "bob" In this code I don't think you need to call value_as_address for an array; likewise reading from memory. The patch also doesn't address the wide-string case, which it should. Tom