From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25326 invoked by alias); 18 May 2012 21:17:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 25313 invoked by uid 22791); 18 May 2012 21:17:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 May 2012 21:17:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4ILGle9028560 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 18 May 2012 17:16:47 -0400 Received: from psique (ovpn-112-27.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.27]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q4ILGgEE024407; Fri, 18 May 2012 17:16:44 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Add ARI directory to gdb sources References: <003901cd3337$66ac7b10$34057130$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <20120516144420.GW10253@adacore.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 21:17:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120516144420.GW10253@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Wed, 16 May 2012 07:44:20 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00715.txt.bz2 On Wednesday, May 16 2012, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> But after looking at the suggestion, it appears that you can't just >> use gdb_ari.sh alone, the update-web-ari script also uses >> gdb_find.sh script for instance, and a modified version of this >> update-web-air should probably also be added. > > Here's what I think: Everything that generates is required to generate > the HTML code should be moved to the GDB directory. gdb/ari/ seems > fine to me, but others might want to comment. Unless the location > is critical to the implementation, which I hope it won't be, you > can start working on the move and submit patches. It should be > relatively easy to change the names if other suggestions appear. Pierre showed up in IRC and mentioned that someone suggested `gdb/contrib'. I could not find the thread/message, but I support this idea FWIW. `gdb/contrib/ari' would be good, then. My rationale is that ARI is not part of GDB as a program nor distributed with it, so creating `gdb/ari' would perhaps confuse people because there are other directories there like `gdb/mi' or `gdb/cli'. My 2 cents. -- Sergio