From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13554 invoked by alias); 23 May 2012 14:45:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 13533 invoked by uid 22791); 23 May 2012 14:45:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 May 2012 14:45:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4NEjEGX017400 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 23 May 2012 10:45:14 -0400 Received: from psique (ovpn-113-148.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.148]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4NEjB2n015477; Wed, 23 May 2012 10:45:13 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches Subject: Re: New ARI warning Wed May 23 01:55:03 UTC 2012 References: <20120523015503.GA25312@sourceware.org> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 14:45:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Wed, 23 May 2012 00:27:39 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00893.txt.bz2 On Wednesday, May 23 2012, Doug Evans wrote: > Hmmm, there's more than a few uses of long long in gdb (not all > conditioned on CC_HAS_LONG_LONG, though most are in target files) and > gdbserver (I was pretty sure I checked at the time). > > So is this ARI check outdated? I saw this, too. -- Sergio