From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10523 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2002 08:54:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10303 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2002 08:54:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2002 08:54:18 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAT8TfP24366; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 03:29:41 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAT8sHD08842; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 03:54:17 -0500 Received: from north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com.redhat.com (vpnuser1.stuttgart.redhat.com [172.16.4.1]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAT8sDC25345; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 03:54:15 -0500 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, neroden@twcny.rr.com Subject: Re: (toplevel patch) Remove 'vault' targets References: <20021128024607.GA14747@doctormoo> <3DE59B7C.10205@redhat.com> <200211280501.gAS519S00664@envy.delorie.com> <3DE65CE4.5020908@redhat.com> From: Nick Clifton Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 00:54:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3DE65CE4.5020908@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00736.txt.bz2 Hi Andrew, > >> I think its better for Nath. to be committing this stuff > >> incrementally (at least to the src repository). That way it gets > >> exposed to the mainstream sooner. > > We could start committing to src if we don't mind src and gcc being > > out of sync until gcc's freeze is over. > > M'kay by me. Nick? Preference? I would prefer to keep the two projects in sync if possible. I assume that there is no great urgency to remove the vault targets, so why not wait until the gcc freeze is over and the patch can be applied to both projects at the same time ? Cheers Nick