From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2710 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2009 16:32:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 2639 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Aug 2009 16:32:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:32:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7EGUE2h016357; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:30:14 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n7EGUDRx030935; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:30:13 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7EGUBrk026251; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:30:12 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6655C3784C5; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:30:11 -0600 (MDT) To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch/doc] Tweak "info inferiors" output. References: <200908141646.01031.pedro@codesourcery.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:38:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200908141646.01031.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri\, 14 Aug 2009 16\:46\:00 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00197.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> Here's a tiny piece I'm cutting out of the pending multi-exec patch. Pedro> (Tromey, we talked a bit about this bit at the end of Pedro> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-06/msg00668.html) Thanks for doing this. Tom