From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-68711-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 6947 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2009 22:27:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 6939 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Dec 2009 22:27:10 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:27:03 +0000
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) 	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB1MQbCf029311 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); 	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:26:37 -0500
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) 	by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB1MQbJp017078; 	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:26:37 -0500
Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) 	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB1MQZWR010548; 	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:26:36 -0500
Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) 	id 64BB9378190; Tue,  1 Dec 2009 15:26:35 -0700 (MST)
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,         Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>,         "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] let record_resume fail immediately on error
References: <daef60380910230029v4e794c0s112b50858de3a22@mail.gmail.com> 	<daef60380911032115v69167866o65c3b90e4622a382@mail.gmail.com> 	<daef60380911092301t5da31e96g7e579c2e9b35d9fb@mail.gmail.com> 	<m3vdhi9gtw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> 	<daef60380911101654o1c113cc2yc43f36cbd4118424@mail.gmail.com> 	<daef60380911232215g1c592d40h102b6809322d1a82@mail.gmail.com> 	<m3tywj26cq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> 	<daef60380911241800tf8f140pffeb4fffc2418d96@mail.gmail.com> 	<20091125162458.GF26004@adacore.com> 	<m3ws1exz97.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> 	<daef60380911252239t3cca40c5md94526d67085dcdd@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:27:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <daef60380911252239t3cca40c5md94526d67085dcdd@mail.gmail.com> 	(Hui Zhu's message of "Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:39:56 +0800")
Message-ID: <m3einemiuc.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2

>>>>> ">" == Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> writes:

>> What about following change:
>> Change record_message to record_message (struct regcache *regcache,
>> enum target_signal signal)
[...]

>> Do you think it's OK?

I think that addresses my complaints.  Thanks.

Tom