From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12195 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2011 12:11:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 12108 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jan 2011 12:11:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:11:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0SCBBJe004361 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 28 Jan 2011 07:11:11 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0SCBAti011188; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 07:11:11 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0SCBAv6030037; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 07:11:10 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 180993784E2; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 05:11:10 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Hui Zhu , gdb-patches ml Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Move the cmdarg before load execarg References: <20110128095213.GA18993@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:25:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110128095213.GA18993@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:52:13 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00541.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> It apparently breaks the much more common case of: Jan> gdb program -ex 'b main' FWIW, I think backward compatibility here is more important than whether or not the options are defined in the best way possible. In this case it is especially true, since there is a fairly reasonable workaround. Tom