From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-82517-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 20256 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2011 15:20:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 20206 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jul 2011 15:20:07 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:19:49 +0000
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6MFJe6G006928	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:19:40 -0400
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199])	by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6MFJevP001186;	Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:19:40 -0400
Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6MFJcd7011343;	Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:19:39 -0400
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: partially available registers
References: <m3vcv6xegp.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<m3sjq79soa.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m3y5zsyajz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<201107221425.46930.pedro@codesourcery.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:40:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <201107221425.46930.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's	message of "Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:25:46 +0100")
Message-ID: <m3ei1iz6k5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00612.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:

Pedro> # of expected passes            39
Pedro> with an unpatched gdb (x86-64-linux), same as with patched gdb.
Pedro> Is that expected?

It definitely fails for me with unpatched gdb.

Does your machine have AVX?  I believe it will only fail on an
AVX-capable machine.

Tom