From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30959 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2011 03:06:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 30949 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Aug 2011 03:06:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 03:06:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7936M8G030759 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 8 Aug 2011 23:06:22 -0400 Received: from psique ([10.3.112.5]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7936Hho014265; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 23:06:19 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: John Lindal Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Allow -data-disassemble to run with only -s option References: <587BFD3C-0540-49FA-87F9-89CBBF2FF010@newplanetsoftware.com> <3DBE6912-1DE6-4B8B-8353-96855B07268E@newplanetsoftware.com> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 03:06:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Sergio Durigan Junior's message of "Mon, 08 Aug 2011 23:57:25 -0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00170.txt.bz2 Sorry, I made some mistakes. See below. Sergio Durigan Junior writes: > John Lindal writes: >> 2011-08-06 John Lindal >> >> * mi-cmd-disas.c: Accept only -s option. Automatically set end to end >> of function, or complain that start address is not part of any function. > > I think those lines are too long. We try to limit the lines on 80 > characteres (some people set a hard limit at 72, IIRC). Actually the length is OK here. >> + if (!line_seen && !file_seen && !num_seen && start_seen && !end_seen) > > Same issue here. And here too. Sorry about the confusion.