Re: [RFC] stept, nextt, finisht, untilt, continuet

Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-30T11:56:45Z

On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:01:27 +0200, pfee@talk21.com wrote:
> I like the 'step' mode of scheduler-locking, but often wish it applied to the
> "next" command, not just step.

I agree, it does not apply to the continue-over-call part of `next'. But that
is a bug which should be fixed.

> My suggestion would be to create a "set scheduler-locking next" mode in which
> both "step" and "next" operate with other threads locked out.

Do you think the "step" mode would be still useful if "next" exists?

Thanks,
Jan