Re: [RFC] stept, nextt, finisht, untilt, continuet

pfee
2011-08-30T10:01:44Z

> On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 03:48:51 +0200, Doug Evans wrote:

> > Sometimes I want to run with scheduler-locking on, but having to turn it
on,
> > perform the command, and remember to turn it off afterwards is annoying.
>
> Please no, Fedora already has default `set scheduler-locking step' because
> this is what the users expect from the stepping commands.
>
> What are the reasons for not using `set scheduler-locking step'?
>

I like the 'step' mode of scheduler-locking, but often wish it applied to the
"next" command, not just step.

My suggestion would be to create a "set scheduler-locking next" mode in which
both "step" and "next" operate with other threads locked out.

Thanks,
Paul