From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6762 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2013 02:22:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 6750 invoked by uid 89); 6 Dec 2013 02:22:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 02:22:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rB62MZmk016780 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:22:35 -0500 Received: from psique (ovpn-113-192.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.192]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rB62MWn4026984 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:22:34 -0500 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Tom Tromey Cc: Pedro Alves , GDB Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] Sanitize gdbarch access on probe/SDT API References: <1386225226-18549-1-git-send-email-sergiodj@redhat.com> <52A079DD.5050101@redhat.com> <87d2lanaeo.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 02:22:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87d2lanaeo.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Thu, 05 Dec 2013 16:30:23 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00218.txt.bz2 On Thursday, December 05 2013, Tom Tromey wrote: > Don't wait -- those patches depend on the minsym series. > I don't plan to check that in until 7.7, since it seems imminent, > since the minsym series is fairly large, and since the series could > probably use more testing on hosts that I don't have access to. OK, thanks, then the patch is still valid :-). -- Sergio