From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-49475-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11313 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2007 20:13:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 11303 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jun 2007 20:13:13 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:13:12 +0000
Received: (qmail 13287 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2007 20:13:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (jimb@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 18 Jun 2007 20:13:10 -0000
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>, 	  Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
Subject: Re: [rfc] Shared libraries over the remote protocol, take two
References: <20070618150211.GA23415@caradoc.them.org>
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:13:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20070618150211.GA23415@caradoc.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:02:11 -0400")
Message-ID: <m3d4ztqawa.fsf@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00348.txt.bz2


Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
> Index: gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
> ===================================================================
> --- gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo.orig	2007-06-18 10:15:05.000000000 -0400
> +++ gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo	2007-06-18 10:15:14.000000000 -0400
> @@ -12856,58 +12856,80 @@ If you do, that may be a bug in your rem
>  in @value{GDBN}.  You may want to report the problem to the
>  @value{GDBN} developers.
>  
> -The available settings are:
> +For each packet @var{name}, the command to enable or disable the
> +packet is @code{set remote @var{name}-packet}.  The available settings
> +are:

Not a big deal by any means, but: while I understand the appeal of not
repeating '-packet' over and over again, I wonder if this is going to
lead to questions as people jump straight to the table and skip the
explanation.  It seems to me there's some value in having the table
list exactly what you're supposed to type.