From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-49483-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 1821 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2007 22:04:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 1810 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jun 2007 22:04:46 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:04:41 +0000
Received: (qmail 20376 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2007 22:04:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (jimb@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 18 Jun 2007 22:04:39 -0000
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>, 	  Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
Subject: Re: [rfc] Shared libraries over the remote protocol, take two
References: <20070618150211.GA23415@caradoc.them.org> 	<m3lkehqcsx.fsf@codesourcery.com> 	<20070618193854.GA29250@caradoc.them.org>
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:04:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20070618193854.GA29250@caradoc.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:38:54 -0400")
Message-ID: <m3d4zsdimg.fsf@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00356.txt.bz2


Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 12:31:58PM -0700, Jim Blandy wrote:
>> With the following DTD:
>> 
>>     <!-- library-list: Root element with versioning -->
>>     <!ELEMENT library-list  (library)*>
>>     <!ATTLIST library-list  version CDATA   #FIXED  "1.0">
>>     <!ELEMENT library       (segment)*>
>>     <!ATTLIST library       name    CDATA   #REQUIRED>
>>     <!ELEMENT segment       EMPTY>
>>     <!ATTLIST segment       address CDATA   #REQUIRED>
>> 
>> there's no way to have several segments at different offsets, because
>> segments aren't allowed to have names.  Shouldn't segments have a name
>> attribute?
>
> I don't think we need to name them to do that.  If we did, we'd have
> to define meanings for the names, and so forth...

Oh, I see: they're *segments*, not sections.  That seems fine.