From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30940 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2009 19:29:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 30906 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Aug 2009 19:29:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:29:26 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7EJTNBh004641; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:29:23 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n7EJTMFn026468; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:29:22 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7EJTLcF026147; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:29:21 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0C61E3784C5; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:29:21 -0600 (MDT) To: ke@alum.bu.edu Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: iconv returning byte order marks for Solaris 2.9 References: <346309.57700.qm@web33807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:13:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <346309.57700.qm@web33807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Andrew's message of "Tue\, 21 Jul 2009 11\:55\:35 -0700 \(PDT\)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew writes: Andrew> Thanks for the patch. I'm actually generating solaris binaries Andrew> using a cross compiler (from a Linux box) and in my current Andrew> configuration it doesn't work. __STDC_ISO_10646__ is not defined. Andrew> I will try installing gcc locally and see how that works. Hi, what is the status of this? I'm asking because if I need to make some changes to gdb's configury, I'd like to have plenty of time before 7.0. thanks, Tom