From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25030 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2010 22:12:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 24912 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Oct 2010 22:12:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:11:53 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o96MBo3q017777 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 6 Oct 2010 18:11:50 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o96MBn8d027548; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 18:11:49 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o96MBmmq012438; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 18:11:48 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 122AB378893; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 16:11:47 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: dje@google.com (Doug Evans) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] New python module gdb.types References: <20101006204434.DCD842461B2@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20101006204434.DCD842461B2@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> (Doug Evans's message of "Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:44:34 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00090.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> This patch adds a new python module to gdb, gdb.types. Doug> It contains a small collection of utilities that I've been using. Doug> Ok to check in? It seems reasonable to me. I wouldn't mind if has_field were made a method on Type, but of course that can be done at any time. I think the documentation would be a little improved if the gdb.Type documentation had an xref to the new module's documentation. Tom