From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30492 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2011 20:26:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 30483 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Feb 2011 20:26:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:26:20 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1IKQ7Lk012639 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:26:07 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1IKQ7jD022293; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:26:07 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1IKQ5Rm012519; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:26:06 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 73FE4378BE1; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:26:05 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Keith Seitz , Pierre Muller Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix for testsuite errors with gdbserver (remote) References: <4D5C71F6.80208@vmware.com> <000901cbcf8b$a7e35b50$f7aa11f0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <4D5EBF32.30802@redhat.com> <201102181954.25496.pedro@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:30:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201102181954.25496.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:54:25 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00496.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> I'm not convinced. It looks like a workaround for something Pedro> the python exited observer isn't doing right. That could be, but what is that? All that python_inferior_exit is doing to provoke the crash is calling get_current_arch. Under what circumstances is this not safe? I would have thought -- perhaps naively -- that it was always safe. Tom