From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7705 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2011 20:28:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 7695 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Feb 2011 20:28:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:28:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1NKS3Hd002482 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:28:03 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1NKS3sb024724; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:28:03 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1NKS2NH019313; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:28:03 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 57B5E3784FF; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:28:02 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfa/rfc] Build libcommon.a for gdb and gdbserver References: <4D30E23F.3080103@codesourcery.com> <201102231833.46704.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201102232021.57283.pedro@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201102232021.57283.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:21:57 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00654.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> I wasn't objecting. I agree with going back. We're Pedro> seeing more trouble than benefit from configure+Makefile Pedro> under common/ at this point. But I'd prefer to do an actual Pedro> revert, just to make sure we don't inadvertently leave Pedro> something behind or forget something. I realized my note may not have been totally clear -- I just realized I didn't really know what I was doing, and unlike other areas where I don't know what I am doing, in this one I don't have a pressing need to learn, I was just noodling around to little purpose. I have to get back to the stuff I'm really supposed to be doing :) Concretely, I tend to agree about reverting but I am not committed to it. I think forward motion and enthusiasm is more important than the extra configury or whatever. Tom