From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31650 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2011 16:53:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 31623 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Mar 2011 16:53:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_GD,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:53:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2LGrk5d015234 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:53:46 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2LGrjJA004794; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:53:46 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2LGrjD7003337; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:53:45 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id C45B6378491; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:53:44 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] DWARF-3+ DW_AT_accessibility defaults #2 (GCC PR debug/45124) References: <20110321154428.GA3761@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:29:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110321154428.GA3761@host1.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:44:28 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00964.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> Normally it probably is not of much concern as FSF GCC defaults to Jan> -gdwarf-2 where no changes happen. Just Fedoras+RHELs default to Jan> -gdwarf-3 where the assumed defaults have changed, therefore Jan> proposing for FSF GDB to verify DW_AT_producer - it affects even Jan> FSF GCCs when one uses -gdwarf-3 or -gdwarf-4. I think this is ok. I am not really a fan of producer checks, but I couldn't think of anything better. Tom