From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9111 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2011 15:36:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 8892 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Apr 2011 15:36:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:36:05 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3PFa5ok021555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:36:05 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3PFa4cv022744; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:36:05 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3PFa4OM009693; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:36:04 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id E2C9E3781C7; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:36:03 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] gdb_gcore man/help/install [+doc] References: <20110425074138.GA5408@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110425074138.GA5408@host1.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:41:39 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00442.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> gcore does not have man page, does not have "-h" help option Jan> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697482 - by Steve Tyler I wonder if we could use the same texi->man rules that gcc uses. Jan> The ".1.z" rule seems bogus to me, I have found these entries for it: [...] Jan> I would prefer to just remove it. The only /usr/bin/pack I have is from Jan> allegro which even has a different commandline syntax. Yes, nuke it. Tom