From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20515 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2011 16:04:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 20504 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jul 2011 16:04:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:03:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6KG3alg032104 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:03:36 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6KG3aUY010681; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:03:36 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6KG3Y9A030959; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:03:34 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: pmuldoon@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] Prompt memory management/cleanups References: <201107201612.23708.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201107201645.14136.pedro@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:06:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201107201645.14136.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:45:13 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00543.txt.bz2 Pedro> I think we should still xstrdup before xfree though as Pedro> a general rule in these sort of scenarios. Yeah. Tom