From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10321 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2011 20:09:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 10271 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Aug 2011 20:09:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:09:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p74K9NS6014889 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 4 Aug 2011 16:09:23 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p74K9M8s024915; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 16:09:23 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p74K9Lp7005930; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 16:09:21 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Don't preserve `uiout' across TRY_CATCH. References: <201108031910.42133.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201108041926.16697.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201108041946.35532.pedro@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:09:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201108041946.35532.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Thu, 4 Aug 2011 19:46:35 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> On Thursday 04 August 2011 19:26:16, Pedro Alves wrote: >> One step closer to -Wshadow :-) Pedro> Reminds me that now could be a good time for Pedro> -Wmissing-prototypes and perhaps -Wstrict-prototypes ? Sounds good to me. Tom