From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17046 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2011 21:07:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 17033 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Aug 2011 21:07:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:07:09 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7CL788v021525 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:07:08 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7CL77FH016221; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:07:07 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7CL766l005879; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:07:06 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Sanjoy Das Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] Register the proxy unwinder. References: <1312903509-25132-1-git-send-email-sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com> <1312903509-25132-7-git-send-email-sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:07:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1312903509-25132-7-git-send-email-sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com> (Sanjoy Das's message of "Tue, 9 Aug 2011 20:55:08 +0530") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00264.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Sanjoy" == Sanjoy Das writes: Sanjoy> Register the proxy unwinder introduced in the previous commit so that Sanjoy> it actually gets picked up and used. It seems to me that we'd always want the JIT unwinder available, and we'd always want it first on the list -- so we could add it in a single generic place instead of modifying all the *-tdep.c files. What do you think of that? Tom