From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-85998-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 7377 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2011 21:55:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 7369 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Dec 2011 21:55:49 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:55:29 +0000
Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pB9LtOU1022852	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Fri, 9 Dec 2011 16:55:24 -0500
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199])	by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pB9LtNl6002629;	Fri, 9 Dec 2011 16:55:24 -0500
Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pB9LtL5p009633;	Fri, 9 Dec 2011 16:55:22 -0500
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,        Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] testsuite: Fix mi-solib.exp without debuginfos  [Re: [3/3] RFC: fix PR mi/8444]
References: <m31usz3la9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<201111251608.pAPG81oE002175@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>	<20111202011800.GA23680@host2.jankratochvil.net>	<m3hb19ea0e.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<20111209212530.GA4306@host2.jankratochvil.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:56:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20111209212530.GA4306@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's	message of "Fri, 9 Dec 2011 22:25:30 +0100")
Message-ID: <m3d3bxe7g6.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00317.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:

Jan> On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 22:00:01 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> Unfortunately, a Tcl proc returns its last computed value if there is no
>> explicit return.  So, this caused:

Jan> With the patch of mine it either returns the same value as before or it
Jan> returns value 0.  And I do not have the problem reproducible, where to
Jan> reproduce it?

I will look at it on Monday.
Sorry for not investigating more before sending the email.

Tom