From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 482 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2012 19:13:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 472 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jan 2012 19:13:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SINGLE_HEADER_1K,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:13:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q06JD8ts014721 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 6 Jan 2012 14:13:26 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q06HpHX8032466; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 12:51:17 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q06HpE8H010504; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 12:51:15 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: oza Pawandeep Cc: Yao Qi , Petr =?utf-8?Q?Hluz=C3=ADn?= , paawan oza , "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" , chandra krishnappa Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm reversible : References: <998639.46560.qm@web112516.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4EDAD0EF.20405@codesourcery.com> <4EDC7CF2.1090505@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:13:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (oza Pawandeep's message of "Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:36:25 +0530") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00245.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Oza" == oza Pawandeep writes: Oza> If I understood you correctly, I should be submitting copyright Oza> information, and changes. Do you have paperwork on file with the FSF already? You ought to, given that you have another patch in the tree; though perhaps it was not big enough. If you do not have paperwork, then you must file it before we can put your change in. If you do have paperwork, I can put it in soon. Tom