From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32725 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2008 19:26:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 32717 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jun 2008 19:26:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 19:25:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m59JPuRL011600 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 15:25:56 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m59JPtqh000530; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 15:25:55 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-10-41.bos.redhat.com [10.16.10.41]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m59JPtq4001842; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 15:25:55 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 7793A37814F; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:25:54 -0600 (MDT) To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: fix two field name completion bugs References: <20080609184545.GB1378@caradoc.them.org> <20080609191518.GA3599@caradoc.them.org> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-Attribution: Tom Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 22:50:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20080609191518.GA3599@caradoc.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Mon\, 9 Jun 2008 15\:15\:18 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00173.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Daniel> On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:11:59PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: >> I can commit that version if you prefer. Just let me know. I've >> appended the new completion.exp patch. Daniel> Please do. If it survives, perhaps we should try removing them all Daniel> :-) Ok, I've checked it in. Thanks for the review. Tom