From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24453 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2009 17:30:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 24439 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jul 2009 17:30:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_33,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:30:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n62HTcj8027897; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:29:38 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n62HTbAf012925; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:29:37 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-225-54.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.225.54]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n62HTaVG020371; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:29:37 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 23E0288807E; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:29:35 -0600 (MDT) To: Ian Lance Taylor Cc: Jakub Jelinek , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Binutils Development , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Patch: merge src and gcc copies of dwarf2.h References: <20090630195100.GT3101@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:30:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Ian Lance Taylor's message of "Wed\, 01 Jul 2009 17\:29\:46 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Ian" == Ian Lance Taylor writes: >> 2009-07-01 Tom Tromey >> * elf/dwarf2.h: Remove, renaming to... >> * dwarf2.h: ... this. Ian> I'm not sure I really understand what the problem is. After all, we Ian> already share files in the include directory between gcc and src. But Ian> if this seems like the right patch to make, it's OK. It apparently messes up the standard way to make a merged gcc+src tree. I got a report from Joseph Myers about this, but now I can't find it in the archives. Tom