From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14883 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2009 17:36:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 14872 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Sep 2009 17:36:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:36:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n81Hafrb024697; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 13:36:41 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n81HaetD024667; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 13:36:40 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n81HabVh000746; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 13:36:37 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id E0EAA378211; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:36:36 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: "Jakob Engblom" Cc: Subject: Re: GDB MI Reverse Commands added [3 of 3] References: <00d001ca265a$ddd0c800$99725800$@com> <4A95DDD6.2000200@vmware.com> <010001ca2a3b$d86846b0$8938d410$@com> <031101ca2b02$7a77a1f0$6f66e5d0$@com> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <031101ca2b02$7a77a1f0$6f66e5d0$@com> (Jakob Engblom's message of "Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:48:16 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jakob" == Jakob Engblom writes: >> testsuite/gdb.mi/ >> * mi2-reverse.exp: New file. Test for reverse option to the following MI >> commands: exec-continue, exec-finish, exec-next, exec-step, >> exec-next-instruction, exec-step-instruction. (liangyi@newfield-tech.com) Jakob> And finally, to simplify the paperwork, we change the contributor Jakob> here so taht our subcontractor does not have to deal with Jakob> copyright assignments. Please contact the FSF assignment people to see whether this is acceptable. CC me on the email. Thanks. Tom