From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8086 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2010 21:42:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 8076 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Mar 2010 21:42:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:42:34 +0000 Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2BLgOsX013822 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:42:24 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2BLgN6E015475; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:42:24 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2BLgMXV019612; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:42:23 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 91F6B8884C2; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:42:22 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [2/2] RFC: let "commands" affect multiple breakpoints References: <201003101705.06883.pedro@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:42:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201003101705.06883.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:05:06 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00421.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> I'm okay with change. I only skimmed throught the patch, but I Pedro> was wondering if it should be generalized to not be specific to Pedro> rbreak only, but to all cases we create more than one breakpoint Pedro> with a single command? [...] Pedro> Just curious if you considered it, and decided against it. Nope, I just didn't think of it. I am looking into it. Tom