From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6387 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2010 20:13:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 6371 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Nov 2010 20:13:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:13:51 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA1KDeqB025264 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:13:40 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA1KDe7Z008030; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:13:40 -0400 Received: from parfait.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA1KDcWE030581; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:13:39 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: Nathan Froyd , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix py-inferior.exp for remote cross-endian testing References: <1288380039-21997-1-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com> <20101029201604.GA813@caradoc.them.org> Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:13:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20101029201604.GA813@caradoc.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:16:12 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Daniel> So that's at least one obvious bug ("" vs "auto"), and one more Daniel> complex bug (what should it return for auto?). I'm inclined to say Daniel> that it should return auto, and there should be some other way to find Daniel> out "auto what?"; OTOH, it's a general problem with parameters... Could you file a bug report for this? Tom