From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8140 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2011 07:49:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 8130 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Dec 2011 07:49:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:48:56 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBG7mqQJ008474 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 16 Dec 2011 02:48:52 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBG7mnGD030428; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 02:48:50 -0500 From: Phil Muldoon To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eli@gnu.org Subject: Re: [python] [patch] PR python/13329 References: Reply-to: pmuldoon@redhat.com X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:15:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Tom Tromey's message of "Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:36:43 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00511.txt.bz2 Tom Tromey writes: >>>>>> "Phil" == Phil Muldoon writes: > > Phil> I updated the patch. This patch removes the "maint" command entirely. > Phil> Needs a doc/code review. > > Phil> OK? > > Ok. Thanks. In the current 7.4 release tarball we have set python print-stack on|off. Beyond that pre-release, it has never been released before. As 7.4 is unreleased as yet, we can change it to this new functionality. Ok for 7.4 branch too (to avoid API breakage)? Cheers, Phil