From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12973 invoked by alias); 18 May 2012 22:17:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 12963 invoked by uid 22791); 18 May 2012 22:16:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 May 2012 22:16:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4IMGWjM031858 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 18 May 2012 18:16:32 -0400 Received: from psique (ovpn-112-27.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.27]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4IMGSpF030823; Fri, 18 May 2012 18:16:29 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Add ARI directory to gdb sources References: <003901cd3337$66ac7b10$34057130$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <20120516144420.GW10253@adacore.com> <20120518220009.GO10253@adacore.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 22:17:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120518220009.GO10253@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Fri, 18 May 2012 15:00:09 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00720.txt.bz2 On Friday, May 18 2012, Joel Brobecker wrote: > I have no issues with contrib/ari, and I kind of like it better too. > I do feel the need to correct that the new scripts will be part of GDB, > and thus will be distributed with it as well. Duh. Thank you for this correction, now that I've come to think of it, it makes total sense. So, Pierre, does that answer the question? I guess you're free to go with `gdb/contrib/ari', then. Regards, -- Sergio