From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22205 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2013 10:59:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22196 invoked by uid 89); 1 Jul 2013 10:59:56 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 10:59:56 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r61AxttF025376 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 1 Jul 2013 06:59:55 -0400 Received: from psique (ovpn-113-175.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.175]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r61AxpGW024454 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Jul 2013 06:59:53 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Pedro Alves Cc: Andreas Schwab , GDB Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] Implement gdbarch_gdb_signal_to_target References: <1372664545-3947-1-git-send-email-sergiodj@redhat.com> <51D15D98.3050201@redhat.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 10:59:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <51D15D98.3050201@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Mon, 01 Jul 2013 11:44:40 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 On Monday, July 01 2013, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 07/01/2013 11:40 AM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >>> > There is also include/uapi/asm-generic/signal.h (which happens to agree >>> > with x86 numbering) which will be used for every new architecture port. >> Thanks for pointing that out. > > Could you update the comments in gdb/linux-tdep.c, etc. in that direction? > No need to talk about x86 as some sort of template arch if going forward the > kernel has a truly generic header. Done. Thanks. -- Sergio