Re: [RFA] Re: [RFC][patch 1/9] initial Python support

Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-19T00:45:01Z

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 05:24:30PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Daniel> I think that these are now "gdb commands", effectively. So, sorry,
> Daniel> but there's a bit more documentation you get to write :-) No new
> Daniel> undocumented public interfaces.
>
> So, you mean, document the Python API in the manual? Or more info in
> the doc strings here? (I assume the former.)

The former. I don't know how much technical complexity it's worth to
keep the doc strings and manual in sync, but the manual is pretty
important.

> So, truly critical python code should just be included directly; but
> at the same time the amount of critical code should be kept to a
> minimum.

I agree.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery