From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24145 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2009 23:44:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 24137 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Apr 2009 23:44:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:43:57 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3MNhmJ1014866; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:43:48 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n3MNhl3s018054; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:43:47 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-14-158.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.158]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3MNhkef011334; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:43:46 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9AC1537829A; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:43:45 -0600 (MDT) To: "Pierre Muller" Cc: Subject: Re: [RFC] Change OK: to ARI: for ARI rule ignore References: <001901c9c399$81854fe0$848fefa0$@u-strasbg.fr> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:44:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <001901c9c399$81854fe0$848fefa0$@u-strasbg.fr> (Pierre Muller's message of "Thu\, 23 Apr 2009 00\:27\:21 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00624.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pierre" == Pierre Muller writes: Pierre> Thus, I would like to restrict that rule to only accept Pierre> /* ARI: rule_name */. I think this sounds like a good idea. Pierre> The main problem if I commit both before next release is that, Pierre> if ARI is rerun on gdb 6.8 release, this change will generate Pierre> new false warnings. Is that something we would want to do? Can't we just run it once, say today, and save the results? I mean, if that is something we need. Tom