From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13782 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2009 18:06:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 13771 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jun 2009 18:06:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:06:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n59I6LxD027958 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:06:21 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n59I6KD4032420; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:06:20 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-99.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.99]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n59I6IZD016895; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:06:19 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 333D0888077; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 12:06:18 -0600 (MDT) To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit] Rename some test binaries References: <20090609171641.GA21222@caradoc.them.org> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:06:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20090609171641.GA21222@caradoc.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Tue\, 9 Jun 2009 13\:16\:41 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00232.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Daniel> I've checked in this obvious patch, which gives a number of affected Daniel> tests unique output files. They continue to share source files. I Daniel> didn't audit for every output file used by every test, but these are Daniel> the only cases I've seen fail. I think this also needs patches to all the Makefile.in's. Unless you want to take the opportunity to get rid of this stuff... :) Daniel> We'd need a more thorough check if we were going to parallelize .exp Daniel> files. This sure would be nice. Tom