From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10252 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2009 18:05:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 10243 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2009 18:05:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:05:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5TI5DUE030805 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:05:13 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5TI5CV2029778; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:05:12 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-225-41.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.225.41]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5TI5BxS021700; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:05:12 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0340F3784C5; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:05:10 -0600 (MDT) To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org CC: Jan Kratochvil Subject: Re: RFC: parallelize "make check" References: <20090629165708.GA30963@caradoc.them.org> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:05:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20090629165708.GA30963@caradoc.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Mon\, 29 Jun 2009 12\:57\:08 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00835.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Tom> Just FYI, Jan mentioned on irc that this made some existing test suite Tom> instability worse. Daniel> I've been having a lot of trouble with foll-fork.exp printing output Daniel> after prompts. I hadn't heard about that one... Jan? What he did mention to me is: gdb.mi/mi-file-transfer.exp, gdb.server/file-transfer.exp, gdb.base/focus-cmd-prev.exp, gdb.xml/tdesc-regs.exp, gdb.base/watchpoint.exp and some others already filtered out randomly FAIL when run in parallel Tom