From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24702 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2010 18:13:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 24692 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2010 18:13:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:13:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7IIDWHB002532 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:13:32 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7IIDWE9021201; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:13:32 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7IIDVHk005883; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:13:31 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id E0C263780C2; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:13:30 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Phil Muldoon Subject: Re: [patch] Implement post_event for Python scripts. References: <4C45F0B0.5000903@redhat.com> <201008181445.52900.pedro@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:13:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201008181445.52900.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:45:52 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00310.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> It was brought to my attention that this unfortunatly breaks Pedro> Windows builds: Oops, sorry about that. Pedro> The expedient way to fix this I guess would be to resurrect gdb_pipe Pedro> from that patch, so that we have a consistent way across hosts Pedro> to create a pipe. Pedro> I do agree that using pipes on common code to wake up the event loop Pedro> is tackling at the wrong level (we should have an abstracted way to Pedro> do this, using pipes on posix hosts, events on Windows, etc.), but, Pedro> I'm happy with a simpler way for now. Any way is ok by me, but the existing event code in mingw-hdep.c looks pretty simple too. I don't understand all of it, but I could try to make a patch taking this direction if you want. Just let me know. Tom