From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7503 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2011 18:22:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 7490 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Apr 2011 18:22:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:21:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3FILedR013248 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:21:40 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3FILduG007452; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:21:39 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3FILcWx005631; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:21:39 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 83622379306; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:21:38 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: "Pierre Muller" Cc: , "'Maxim Grigoriev'" Subject: Re: [RFA-v2] xtensa-tdep.c ARI fixes References: <15837.6740910628$1302342165@news.gmane.org> <37948.3434990563$1302853234@news.gmane.org> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:22:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <37948.3434990563$1302853234@news.gmane.org> (Pierre Muller's message of "Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:40:05 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00227.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pierre" == Pierre Muller writes: Pierre> Here is a new version that adds this xfree call. Pierre> Could someone test this patch out? Pierre> Again, I have no way to trigger that code, so I can't really test it. The patch looks good to me. But I agree, testing would be nice. Pierre> + && (i == C0_RA || cache->c0.c0_rt[i].fr_reg != C0_RA); Extra space after the "&&" :-) Tom