From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 656 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2011 20:23:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 622 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Aug 2011 20:23:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 20:22:59 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p78KMx0j017833 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 16:22:59 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p78KMwMx005749; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 16:22:58 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p78KMvw9032110; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 16:22:57 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Fix DW_OP_stack_value for big endian References: <20110805210437.GA26918@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 20:23:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110805210437.GA26918@host1.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Fri, 5 Aug 2011 23:04:37 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00154.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> I am not completely sure with the DWARF standard understanding for Jan> DW_OP_implicit_value (DWARF_VALUE_LITERAL) but I think it also Jan> should be fixed (if such DWARF is valid at all). I think I asked about this when implementing this DWARF addition in gdb, but I can't find the messages right now. Anyway, this patch is fine by me. Tom