Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Koning <paulkoning@comcast.net>,
	pmuldoon@redhat.com,        gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Python: fetch value when building gdb.Value object
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:40:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3aa9grcji.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111001090443.GA11227@host1.jankratochvil.net> (Jan	Kratochvil's message of "Sat, 1 Oct 2011 11:04:43 +0200")

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:

Paul> If so, most of the Python code seems to be a candidate for
Paul> RETURN_MASK_ERROR.

Jan> In fact I do not know, it is a Python thing.
Jan> RETURN_MASK_ALL is right if returned PyExc_KeyboardInterrupt will really abort
Jan> any execution of Python code.  It is probably so, as suggested by:
Jan> 	http://docs.python.org/library/exceptions.html#exceptions.KeyboardInterrupt

Jan> RETURN_MASK_ERROR is right otherwise, but only if it is safe to
Jan> longjmp out from a code called by Python.  This may not be true.
Jan> Python may be C++ exceptions throwing safe but it cannot be safe
Jan> for the GDB longjmp exceptions.  But this case would mean Python is
Jan> buggy for CTRL-C on its own so RETURN_MASK_ERROR probably is not
Jan> right.

I think the Python code in GDB should use RETURN_MASK_ALL in all cases.
The C-c case should be turned into PyExc_KeyboardInterrupt.
Other exceptions should either be ignored or turned into the appropriate
Python exception, depending on the situation.

Letting the C-c case longjmp over the Python implementation is bad, I
would imagine it will result in crashes.  Ignoring it is also bad.

Paul> Probably related: I just tried an infinite Python loop and found
Paul> that control-C had no effect.  I wonder if the Python interpreter
Paul> is setting up its own control-C trap (quite possibly -- that's a
Paul> Python exception after all) and we're losing it somewhere along
Paul> the lines.

Jan> Yes, this is the kind of bug from it, thanks for checking it.

I suspect we have to override Python's SIGINT handling.
I haven't investigated.

Jan> 2011-10-01  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Jan> 	* python/py-value.c (valpy_getitem): New variable back_to.  Register
Jan> 	xfree of field to it.  Call do_cleanups for it.  Use RETURN_MASK_ERROR
Jan> 	instead of RETURN_MASK_ALL.

This patch runs the cleanups too late.  They have to be done before
GDB_PY_HANDLE_EXCEPTION, as that has an early return in it.  Cleanest is
probably doing it all inside the TRY_CATCH.

Tom


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-04 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-21 16:17 Paul Koning
2011-09-28 19:29 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-09-28 20:06   ` Paul Koning
2011-10-04 15:43     ` Tom Tromey
2011-09-28 20:42   ` Paul Koning
2011-10-01  9:05     ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-03 10:22       ` Phil Muldoon
2011-10-04 15:40       ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2011-10-01  9:29   ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-01 10:23     ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-01 11:03       ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-01 12:17     ` Python: fetch value when building gdb.Value object [rediff] Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-01 18:58       ` Paul Koning
2011-10-03 10:19       ` Phil Muldoon
2011-10-03 16:16         ` Paul Koning
2011-10-01  1:00 ` [PING] [RFA] Re: Python: fetch value when building gdb.Value object Paul Koning
2011-10-04 15:45 ` Tom Tromey
2011-10-04 15:51   ` Paul Koning
2011-10-14 20:03     ` Tom Tromey
2011-10-14 20:30       ` Paul Koning
2011-10-19 20:56         ` Tom Tromey
2011-10-19 20:58           ` Paul Koning
2011-10-20 15:09             ` Tom Tromey
2011-10-21  7:46               ` Paul Koning
2011-10-21 17:13                 ` Tom Tromey
2011-10-14 23:36   ` Jim Blandy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3aa9grcji.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
    --to=tromey@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulkoning@comcast.net \
    --cc=pmuldoon@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox