From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18403 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2011 19:59:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 18388 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Nov 2011 19:59:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 19:59:34 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pALJxWGL021836 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:59:32 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pALJxW58028706; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:59:32 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pALJxUD6020247; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:59:31 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Cc: , Subject: Re: [python] [patch] PR 13369/13374 References: <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD030EBD9671@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 19:59:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD030EBD9671@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> (Paul Koning's message of "Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:50:06 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00546.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Paul" == writes: >> + /* Note -- this is not thread-safe. */ Paul> Does the comment "not thread safe" indicate that this is a spot where Paul> the GIL should be acquired and isn't currently? Or doesn't the GIL Paul> help for that? The comment refers to the code being called here. I think the comment can be removed. It isn't ok to call gdb stuff from other Python threads anyway. Tom