From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Berlin To: "Peter.Schauer" Cc: msnyder@cygnus.com, jimb@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ezannoni@cygnus.com Subject: Re: [RFA]: Fix partial symbol lookups Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 09:16:00 -0000 Message-id: References: <200011161706.SAA06577@reisser.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> X-SW-Source: 2000-11/msg00210.html "Peter.Schauer" writes: > > No, I'll clean it up if you like. Assuming you don't want me to just > > revert all the 10-12 changes and be done with it. > > This decision has to be made by the symtab maintainers of course. Sure, but i'd appreciate a friendly opinion as to whether these patches have any hope or not. > > > > No, it points out another problem with `maint check'. Have you ever tried it > > > with your patches ? > > > > Yes, I have. > > (gdb) maintenance check-symtabs > > During symbol reading, type qualifier 'const' ignored. > > During symbol reading, unsupported stack op: 'DW_OP_deref_size'. > > During symbol reading, type qualifier 'volatile' ignored. > > (gdb) > > Well, with gcc-2.95.2 -ggdb on a linux x86 box I get > > (gdb) maint check > During symbol reading, type qualifier 'const' ignored. > During symbol reading, type qualifier 'volatile' ignored. > During symbol reading, type qualifier 'const' ignored. > Global symbol `__24Contains_static_instanceii' only found in misc.cc psymtab > Global symbol `__31Contains_nested_static_instanceii' only found in misc.cc psym > tab > Global symbol `__3Bariii' only found in misc.cc psymtab > Global symbol `__3Fooii' only found in misc.cc psymtab > Global symbol `__5Base1i' only found in misc.cc psymtab > Global symbol `__Q231Contains_nested_static_instance6Nestedi' only found in misc > .cc psymtab > Global symbol `__opi__3Foo' only found in misc.cc psymtab > Global symbol `foo__C22const_vol_method_classRi' only found in misc.cc psymtab > Global symbol `times__3Fooi' only found in misc.cc psymtab > > which is not surprising, because maintenance_check_symtabs calls > lookup_block_symbol with the mangled symbol name. > Perhaps you have applied more patches to your source tree... Hmmmm. Weird. I am using a different gcc, but this shouldn't account for it. --Dan