From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21427 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2009 16:30:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 21409 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2009 16:30:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:30:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3HGUB97014828; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:30:11 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n3HGUAWT029405; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:30:10 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-27.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.27]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3HGU9h8023451; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:30:10 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 528AA3784C3; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:30:09 -0600 (MDT) To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Mention all new options in NEWS References: <83k55jk2a1.fsf@gnu.org> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:30:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <83k55jk2a1.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri\, 17 Apr 2009 13\:22\:46 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00447.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: Eli> Would it be OK with everybody to request that new options be also Eli> mentioned in NEWS, in addition to new commands? Definitely. I think one exception would be something like the new "maint" option in one of Pedro's recent patches -- it is a temporary option that will go away once the multi-inferior bits are more robust. This is a rare case. Tom