From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16879 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2009 01:34:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 16867 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Apr 2009 01:34:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_102,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:34:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3N1WZiS004017; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:32:35 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n3N1WYlV010524; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:32:34 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-14-158.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.158]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3N1WXVE000864; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:32:33 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id A2362C881B1; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:32:32 -0600 (MDT) To: Paul Pluzhnikov Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann , gdb-patches ml , Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch][rfc] Allow GDB to search for the right libthread_db.so.1 References: <1239225742.8871.145.camel@localhost.localdomain> <8ac60eac0904171213p4c075224x5f5c3661d240f383@mail.gmail.com> <20090420131751.GA25075@caradoc.them.org> <8ac60eac0904200947y2acca97arc1a0fc61530357a0@mail.gmail.com> <20090420170154.GA10112@caradoc.them.org> <8ac60eac0904201019g7ba8056bx5e84e6bfdf5935d8@mail.gmail.com> <20090420180352.GA14206@caradoc.them.org> <8ac60eac0904201208m95d4585k2b09f6b6fe5edb40@mail.gmail.com> <20090422172517.GA17235@caradoc.them.org> <8ac60eac0904221810x24763ecaj4a888927b766e7f7@mail.gmail.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0904221810x24763ecaj4a888927b766e7f7@mail.gmail.com> (Paul Pluzhnikov's message of "Wed\, 22 Apr 2009 18\:10\:01 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00631.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Paul" == Paul Pluzhnikov writes: Paul> In fact there was a patch to add a warning if we detect Paul> stripped libpthread.so, as this appears to be a common path Paul> to non-working GDB: Paul> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-02/msg00232.html Paul> The patch didn't make it, though. Did I miss the rejection, or was it just not reviewed? I've tried to keep track of patches that have gone unreviewed. But, I do miss some (I missed this one). I recommend that everybody send pings for patches that go unanswered after some time (1 or 2 weeks). I would like us as a group to review all submitted patches before the release (with the option of choosing to defer a patch, but not its review, to post-7.0). I don't know if this is achievable, but I thought I'd toss it out there as a goal. Tom