From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32146 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2009 19:12:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 32135 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jun 2009 19:12:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:12:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5OJCV6k027821; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:12:31 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5OJCUq1010333; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:12:30 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-198.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.198]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5OJCT0n025800; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:12:30 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 5B3AD3785E4; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:12:29 -0600 (MDT) To: dje@google.com (Doug Evans) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, ccoutant@google.com Subject: Re: [RFA] comdat types preparation References: <20090619234603.CCA7E843F5@localhost> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20090619234603.CCA7E843F5@localhost> (Doug Evans's message of "Fri\, 19 Jun 2009 16\:46\:03 -0700 \(PDT\)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00657.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> I tried to split my "comdat types" patch into two smaller chunks. Doug> This one is the prelude to the real patch that adds the support. Doug> This patch is just a code reorg. Doug> Ok to check in? This looks reasonable to me. Doug> + /* The bfd of this objfile. */ Doug> + bfd* abfd; "bfd *". Ok with that change, assuming it passed regression testing. Tom