From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13392 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2011 17:29:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 13381 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jul 2011 17:29:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:29:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6JHTEJp031405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:29:15 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6JHTErb018826; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:29:14 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6JHTD2e007901; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:29:13 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Paul Pluzhnikov Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Make target_read_string faster over high-latency links. References: <20110715180748.A0390190BC2@elbrus2.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:52:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Paul Pluzhnikov's message of "Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:20:57 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00483.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Paul" =3D=3D Paul Pluzhnikov writes: >> Just to clarify, you are suggesting a new packet, e.g. >> =C2=A0qStr {addr},{maxlen} >> in response to which gdbserver will read up to either terminating NUL, >> or maxlen. Paul> Ping? Paul> Tom, is that what you had in mind? Sorry, I didn't think that you were expecting a response. I am not all familiar with the gdb remote protocol, but yes, that is what I was thinking of. Tom